El testimonio de un testigo presencial puede parecer contundente, pero la ciencia y la experiencia en los tribunales de Tucson demuestran que la memoria humana es mucho menos confiable de lo que parece. Muchas personas creen recordar con precisión lo que vieron, cuando en realidad su mente puede verse afectada...
Many people believe lawyers profit from misery. In reality, criminal defense attorneys stand between individuals and a system designed for efficiency, not fairness. This post explores why hiring a lawyer isn’t about exploitation — it’s about protection, clarity, and hope when everything feels like it’s falling apart.
Pleading “not guilty” isn’t about denying reality — it’s about demanding proof. In Arizona courts, “not guilty” doesn’t mean innocent, it means the state must meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt. Accusations are easy, but convictions must be hard. This post breaks down why the presumption of innocence matters,...
What happens when jurors can’t agree on a verdict in a criminal trial? In Arizona, it results in a mistrial—but that doesn’t mean the case is over. In this post, criminal defense attorney Joel Chorny explains how hung juries work, why retrials are riskier, and why our system might need...
Tomar la decisión de ir a juicio o aceptar un acuerdo puede ser una de las decisiones más difíciles en un caso penal. Este artículo explora los factores legales, personales y estratégicos que influyen en ese momento crucial, y cómo un abogado defensor puede ayudarte a tomar el mejor camino...
What does it really mean to remain silent? In State v. Melendez, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that vague or hesitant answers aren’t enough—you must clearly invoke your right to silence, or risk giving the prosecution ammunition. Here’s what happened, why it matters, and how to protect yourself.
Muchas personas tienen ideas equivocadas sobre lo que hacen los abogados penalistas y cómo funciona la defensa en casos criminales. En este artículo, desmentimos cinco de los mitos más comunes — y explicamos por qué pueden ser peligrosos si enfrentas cargos graves.
What does it mean to truly invoke your right to remain silent? In State v. Melendez, the Arizona Supreme Court held that unclear or hesitant responses don’t count—you must speak up clearly, or the prosecution may use your words against you. Here’s why that matters and how to stay protected.
Facing criminal charges and need to travel? Discover the legal steps to take and what emergencies may justify your absence.
What does it take to properly remain silent? In State v. Melendez, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that hesitation or vague replies aren’t enough—you must clearly assert your right, or risk giving the prosecution an advantage. Find out what happened and how to protect your rights.
